Buyary Home Logo

All the Reviews in One Score

AskAri
New Balance 2010

New Balance 2010

81
BUYARY SCOREExcellent

Soft, durable cushioning and standout style, best suited to cooler-weather wear.

The New Balance 2010 is a chunky retro runner with a surprisingly plush personality, built for walkers, commuters, and style-minded wearers who want softer all-day comfort without a bland sneaker. Its ABZORB cushioning feels springy and absorbs pavement impact, while the broad platform and TPU Stability Web generally keep the ride planted. Experts also found the outsole impressively durable, supporting the brand’s comfort-and-longevity pitch. The catch is airflow: despite the mesh, testing found 1/5 breathability, making it better for cooler weather. Fit is similarly personal, with a pointed toe box troubling some wide feet and soft cushioning feeling unstable for narrower ones. At $145–$170, it is fair value, strongest on sale. Overall appeal depends on comfort, climate, fit, and durability.

New Balance 2010
New Balance 2010
New Balance 2010
New Balance 2010
New Balance 2010
New Balance 2010
New Balance 2010
New Balance 2010
New Balance 2010
New Balance 2010
New Balance 2010
New Balance 2010
New Balance 2010
AskAri

Find Yours

Step 011 of 4 questions

What's your primary reason for buying new sneakers?

Answer to find your best matches.

The Scoreboard

Does this improve your life? Considers, health, habits, and environmental impact.

82
FIT
80
EXPERTS
76
USERS
82
VALUE

Benefits

🛋️
All-Day Cushioning

Soft, springy cushioning makes long walks, commuting, and casual standing noticeably easier.

🛡️
Stable Everyday Ride

The broad platform feels planted while cushioning softens repeated steps on pavement.

✨
Standout Retro Style

Chunky retro-running lines add personality to everyday outfits without sacrificing casual versatility.

👟
Comfortable Roomy Fit

Generous proportions comfortably suit many feet, especially during extended walking and daily errands.

Trade-Offs

🌡️
Runs Warm Inside

Poor airflow can leave feet hot during long walks, especially in warmer weather.

📏
Fit Can Vary

Some wearers find the toe or midfoot snug, making longer walks uncomfortable without careful sizing.

🦶
Softness Feels Unsteady

Very soft cushioning can feel unstable for narrower feet, making longer walks less comfortably supported.

New Balance 2010

Alternatives

The New Balance 2010 excels as a cushioned everyday sneaker, offering breathable comfort, stable support, and a bold retro-runner look. Its chunky build feels less nimble and can look oversized with slimmer outfits, while people wanting a more polished walking shoe may lean toward leather walking shoes, and those prioritizing lighter movement may prefer lightweight mesh running shoes.
Circle

Join the Circle

Where real meets deal

Know what's worth buying-and when.
Tips, special offers, and rewards for buying and sharing.

Document Icon

Publications

1 LEADING PUBLICATION REVIEWS


88
Logo of RunRepeat

RunRepeat’s Sheena is highly impressed by the New Balance 2010, awarding it 92/100 overall. The shoe stands out for exceptional comfort, impact protection, energy return, stability, authentic leather and suede, reflective detailing, and an unusually durable outsole that held up remarkably well in testing. Despite its chunky retro appearance, it feels relatively light and remains comfortable for all-day urban walking. The main drawbacks are significant: breathability is exceptionally poor—the lab’s smoke test gave it just 1/5—and the pointed toe box may feel restrictive for people with wide feet. That makes it a poor summer choice, even though it offers decent vertical toe space and a secure, stable platform. Overall, the review presents the 2010 as a stylish, well-built bargain for cooler-weather wear, especially for shoppers who prioritize cushioning, durability, and reflective safety features.

By Sheena

September 15, 2025Visit Source →
Play TV Icon

YouTube

8 LEADING EXPERT & INFLUENCER REVIEWS


78
Youtube IconSean Go

Sean Go is positive on the WTAPS x New Balance Abzorb 2010, especially its comfort, fit, and wearable fall colorway. He found the chunky ABZORB platform softer and more immediately comfortable than the 1906R or 2002R, though less likely to remain the most comfortable over long-term wear than models like the 992 or 993. The shoe fit true to size, accommodated his slightly wide foot, and felt stable, but the synthetic leather and nubuck disappointed for a collaboration. He also felt the neon midsole accents clashed somewhat with WTAPS’ military aesthetic, though overall he considered it a solid, versatile step forward.

October 21, 2025
80
Youtube IconHes Kicks

Hes Kicks is very enthusiastic about the New Balance 2010, especially its comfort, fit, and distinctive layered design. He finds the 9.5 true to size and more comfortable through the midfoot than the 2002R, while praising the suede detailing, reflective accents, Kith branding, and ABZORB cushioning. His main reservations are that some overlays feel too synthetic for a $150 collaboration and that this colorway mutes the shoe’s otherwise impressive paneling. Still, he considers the model stylish, comfortable, and an exciting example of New Balance creating modern sneakers with retro appeal.

June 17, 2025
84
Youtube Iconcowfreekicks

Cow Free Kicks is highly enthusiastic about the New Balance 2010, especially its striking Grey Days styling and stable, energetic ride. He praises the chrome overlays, retro-inspired honeycomb mesh, generous padding, roomy fit, and surprisingly effective ABZORB bounce, though the shoe feels firmer and heavier than softer modern runners. His smoke test suggests good, if not exceptional, breathability, while the £150 price seems reasonable rather than outstanding. Despite those caveats, he considers the 2010 an excellent lifestyle sneaker and awards it five stars.

May 15, 2026
76
Youtube IconJosh Dominic

Josh Dominic likes the New Balance 2010’s classic New Balance styling, distinctive diamond-knit mesh, chunky shape, and especially its vintage khaki colorway. He appreciates the modern ABZORB midsole and visible heel pods, but his enthusiasm is tempered by the shoe’s snug midfoot fit and relatively firm cushioning. Compared with the 990 V3, 2002R, and even Nike’s Zoom Vomero 5, he finds it less comfortable and less suitable for wider feet. Ultimately, it’s a strong-looking lifestyle sneaker, but he would rather spend more on a 900-series model for a meaningful comfort upgrade.

April 29, 2025
65
Youtube IconHighly Akicktive

Highly Akicktive is ultimately disappointed with the New Balance 2010 and plans to return it. He likes the outdoorsy beef-and-broccoli-inspired colorway, smooth suede-like materials, reflective details, and chunky design, but found noticeable glue marks and mediocre craftsmanship for €170. More importantly, the roomy fit and very soft ABZORB midsole left his narrow feet feeling unsupported and unstable, causing concern about knee discomfort over time. He considers it better suited to wider or chunkier feet, while preferring the firmer, more supportive 2002R.

June 24, 2025
87
Youtube Iconsneaktips

Sneaktips is highly enthusiastic about the New Balance 2010, calling it an underrated standout. He praises its premium suede, distinctive diamond-knit mesh, reflective details, comfortable out-of-the-box fit, and unusually soft, bouncy ABZORB cushioning, comparing it favorably with the 990 V6 and New Balance 1000. His main criticism is aimed at New Balance’s colorway strategy: overly dark or monochromatic releases, heavy laces, and some deconstructed collaborations undermine the model’s sleek, futuristic character. Still, he considers the Bright Gray version stylish, well-built, and an easy recommendation—especially at below-retail pricing.

November 7, 2025
76
Youtube IconTRENDINGUK

TRENDINGUK is excited by the New Balance 2010’s triple-black look and feels it looks considerably better on foot than in hand. The reviewer appreciates its layered mesh and nubuck construction, soft sockliner, and overall design, rating it 7/10—or about 8.5/10 without the quality-control problems. This pair has extensive glue marks, uneven or faded material, and looks possibly worn, prompting a return and replacement. They also question the outsole’s traction in icy conditions, though it should be fine on dry days. Overall, the enthusiasm for the shoe remains strong despite disappointing QC.

November 15, 2025
85
Youtube IconHIGHTIDEJETT

HIGHTIDEJETT is highly enthusiastic about the New Balance 2010, especially its versatile gray-and-cream colorway, reflective blue accents, and chunky 990-like silhouette. He finds the fit true to size and the comfort comparable to the 1906 and 2002, though not as cushioned as the 610, 991v2, or 990v6. While he is indifferent to one unusual mesh section, he considers the shoe stylish with both pants and shorts, regrets nothing about the purchase, and plans to wear it heavily. Overall, it earns a strong recommendation for everyday versatility and appearance.

June 6, 2025

Social

1 INFLUENCER REVIEW


76
TikTok IconTheChosenStore.MY

TheChosenStore.MY is moderately positive about the New Balance 2010. They describe its dark brown-and-black colorway as attractive and its material-rich upper as well suited to formal outfits or events. Comfort is above average, though they place it behind the 202R and 1906. The tone is approving but measured, with the comparison tempering their enthusiasm.

June 12, 2026
Forum Icon

Forum Reviews

CUSTOMER REVIEWS FROM 1 FORUM


76
Logo of Reddit

Redditors are generally positive about the New Balance 2010, especially its distinctive looks, cushioning, and roomy fit. Many find it comfortable for all-day wear, long walks, work, and wide feet, often comparing it favorably with the 2002R, 993, and 990v6. The styling and colorways attract substantial enthusiasm, while sale pricing makes it easier to recommend. Still, experiences vary: some find the toe or midfoot narrow, sizing inconsistent, and the cushioning overly soft or uncomfortable at the heel. Breathability is frequently questioned, ripstop versions can feel warm, and traction may be unreliable on wet surfaces. Trying them on first is sensible.

Many comments

Scales Icon

In-Depth Review

Highlights Icon

Highlights

  • •
    Soft, Springy Cushioning
    ABZORB cushioning feels soft and energetic.
  • •
    Hardwearing Outsole
    Manufacturer testing claims exceptional abrasion resistance.
  • •
    Planted Walking Platform
    TPU support reinforces a stable everyday ride.
  • •
    Distinctive Layered Styling
    Mesh, suede, and leather create visual depth.
Considerations Icon

Considerations

  • •
    Limited Warm-Weather Airflow
    Lab testing rated breathability just 1/5.
  • •
    Variable Toe Fit
    Pointed shaping may restrict wider feet.
  • •
    Softness Can Destabilize
    Narrow feet may feel under-supported.
  • •
    Inconsistent Finishing
    Some pairs show glue and material flaws.

New Balance brings a strong comfort-and-heritage reputation to the 2010, positioning it as a premium lifestyle runner for walking, commuting, and everyday outfits. Its standout ABZORB cushioning gives a softer, springier ride than the 2002R or 1906R, while the chunky platform adds visual impact without feeling excessively heavy. The appeal is strongest for style-conscious walkers, workers, and anyone who enjoys a roomier casual sneaker, though fit can vary more than its relaxed shape suggests. The sections ahead examine its diamond-knit mesh, airflow, durable outsole, toe-box geometry, and TPU Stability Web, alongside the real-world trade-offs of soft cushioning and layered construction. Check the details that match your feet and climate—because this is a sneaker with plenty of bounce, but not every foot enjoys the same landing.

New Balance 2010

Soft, Springy Cushioning

The 2010 delivers a notably soft, energetic ride for everyday walking. Its ABZORB midsole, supplemented by ABZORB SBS heel and forefoot inserts, absorbs pavement impact while adding a pleasant bounce. Reviewers often found it immediately more comfortable than the 1906R or 2002R, though some considered it firmer than modern running shoes and less refined than the 992 or 993. That softness is excellent for commuting and standing, but narrower-footed wearers may find it slightly unstable.

New Balance 2010

Check The Toe Shape

Fit is not as universally roomy as the chunky silhouette implies. The 2010 offers useful vertical space and some wearers with wider feet praise its generous proportions, but testing identified a pointed toe box that can pinch broader forefeet. User experiences also range from true-to-size and comfortably roomy to snug through the midfoot, suggesting foot shape matters substantially. Trying it on first is sensible, especially for wide or narrow feet, and a careful size choice matters more than the relaxed exterior suggests.

New Balance 2010

Stable, But Quite Soft

The broad platform generally feels planted, and the translucent TPU Stability Web shank reinforces the midfoot during ordinary walking. That structure supports the stable impression reported by several reviewers, while the substantial sole helps smooth uneven urban pavement. However, the very soft ABZORB setup can feel under-supported to people with narrow feet, and some users report an awkward heel sensation. It is dependable for casual daily movement, but not a substitute for a more controlled performance shoe.

Limited Airflow

The mesh upper looks ventilated, but real-world airflow is the 2010’s clearest weakness. Independent smoke testing rated breathability just 1/5, suggesting the layered construction traps heat despite the diamond-knit mesh base. That supports the shoe’s cooler-weather appeal, while making it less suitable for hot summers or especially long walks in warm conditions. Some users also report ripstop versions running warm, so thinner socks may help, but they cannot fully offset the shoe’s poor ventilation.

New Balance 2010

Layered, Technical Styling

The upper gives the 2010 much of its personality and premium appeal. Diamond-knit mesh supplies the base, while authentic leather and suede overlays add depth, durability, and a retro-running feel. Molded N branding, reflective details, and sculpted sole geometry reinforce its futuristic, layered look. Reviewers generally praise the materials and on-foot appearance, though collaboration pairs have exposed inconsistent finishing, including glue marks and synthetic-feeling sections. Colorway choice also matters, since darker releases can hide the paneling that makes the design distinctive.

New Balance 2010

Built For Frequent Wear

Durability is a genuine strength, particularly for a fashion-led sneaker. Independent abrasion testing found the rubber outsole resisted wear remarkably well, supporting regular commuting and urban walking. The combination of nubuck, suede, and synthetic overlays also gives the upper structure and a premium visual texture, although collaboration pairs have drawn criticism for synthetic-feeling panels and occasional glue marks. Reflective accents add practical low-light visibility, making the 2010 more functional than its oversized styling suggests.

New Balance 2010

Conclusion

The New Balance 2010 makes its case with a cushioned, springy ride: ABZORB cushioning absorbs pavement impact and adds welcome energy for walking, commuting, and standing. Its broad platform and TPU Stability Web generally feel planted, while the abrasion-resistant outsole promises impressive longevity. The trade-offs are just as clear: layered mesh offers surprisingly poor airflow, and the pointed toe box can pinch wider feet even as others find the fit roomy. Softness may also feel under-supportive for narrow-footed wearers. The suede, leather, and mesh upper delivers distinctive retro-futurist texture, though occasional glue marks and synthetic-feeling panels weaken the premium impression. This is a strong cooler-weather lifestyle sneaker for comfort-focused walkers who value durability and personality, but a less convincing choice for hot climates, wet conditions, or demanding support needs. Its high comfort and style return justify the asking price more convincingly on sale than at full retail.

Feature Scores Icon

Feature Scores

This reflects reviews and ratings from established critics, journalists, and users who have evaluated the item. Their opinions provide a comprehensive assessment.

Performance

Durability

4/5

Traction

3/5

Cushioning

4/5

Fit Accuracy

4/5

Breathability

1/5

Weather Resistance

2/5

Value

Price-to-Quality Ratio

4/5

Price Accessibility

3/5

Resale Value

2/5

Design

Style Variety

4/5

Color Options

4/5

Versatility

4/5

Aesthetic Appeal

5/5

Health

Material Safety

3/5

Arch Support

3/5

Odor Control

2/5

Safety

Slip Resistance

3/5

Ankle Support

3/5

Impact Protection

4/5

Sustainability

Sustainable Materials Use

2/5

Recyclability

1/5

Supply Chain Transparency

1/5

Experience Style

Ease of Use

4/5

Lacing System Versatility

3/5

Maintenance Ease

3/5

Specifications Icon

Specifications

This section outlines the product's key facts, covering essential features, details, dimensions, materials, and any unique characteristics that define its functionality and usability.

Performance

Value

Design

Safety

Sustainability

Experience Style

Question Mark Icon

Frequently Asked Questions


5 Questions