Buyary Home Logo

All the Reviews in One Score

AskAri
Skin Laser Hair Removal Device
CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device

CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device

77
BUYARY SCOREAbove Average

Painless, fast diode-laser treatments with promising results, but high cost and mixed feedback.

The CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device is a premium at-home diode laser for people tired of shaving, salon appointments, and slow IPL routines. Its 810nm laser and Ice Cooling Technology make treatments unusually comfortable, while the broad head keeps sessions quick. Experts generally report slower, thinner regrowth within weeks, supporting the brand’s promise of faster reduction, but real-world results are uneven, with one tester seeing no change after eight weeks. It is best for pale-to-medium skin and dark hair, not darker complexions or light, red, gray, or blonde hair. At roughly $759, the five-year flash lifespan may offset salon costs, but the mixed efficacy makes the return policy worth checking. Overall, comfort, speed, compatibility, and uncertain results shape its recommendation.

CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device
CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device
CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device
CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device
CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device
AskAri

Find Yours

Step 011 of 4 questions

What is your primary goal for using a light hair removal device?

Answer to find your best matches.

The Scoreboard

Does this improve your life? Considers, health, habits, and environmental impact.

84
FIT
80
EXPERTS
TBD
USERS
77
VALUE

Benefits

❄️
Comfortable Cooling Treatment

Ice cooling keeps sessions comfortable, even when treating sensitive bikini and underarm areas.

⚡
Quick Full-Body Sessions

The wide treatment window covers legs and underarms quickly, reducing time spent grooming.

🪒
Less Frequent Shaving

Slower, thinner regrowth means users can shave less often after consistent treatments.

🏠
Salon-Like Convenience

At-home treatment fits around busy schedules without repeated salon appointments or travel.

Trade-Offs

🏋️
Heavy In-Hand Design

Its heavier body can make longer sessions feel awkward, especially around legs and back.

🔊
Constant Treatment Beeps

Repeated beeping during each pulse becomes distracting when treating larger areas repeatedly.

🔌
Restrictive Power Cable

The chunky adapter and cable limit movement, making some body angles harder to reach.

🔘
Confusing One-Button Controls

The simple control scheme can make changing settings or confirming treatment steps unnecessarily unclear.

CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device

Alternatives

For suitable users, the CurrentBody delivers painless, fast sessions and noticeable reduction across areas like legs, underarms, and bikini lines. Its heavier handset and strict compatibility—light-to-medium skin with dark hair—can rule it out for some. People wanting broader skin-tone sensing may prefer an IPL handset, while those prioritizing zero home upkeep might lean toward professional salon laser treatments.
Circle

Join the Circle

Where real meets deal

Know what's worth buying-and when.
Tips, special offers, and rewards for buying and sharing.

Document Icon

Publications

4 LEADING PUBLICATION REVIEWS


77
Logo of Doctor Anne

Doctor Anne provides a measured and insightful six-month evaluation of the €700 CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device, blending professional expertise with real-world testing. She highlights the device’s targeted laser technology and safety-focused design, explaining why at-home results are naturally more modest than professional treatments. Her detailed account covers ease of use, treatment protocols, and technical limitations, such as lower energy output and challenges with curved body areas. While she observes a noticeable but uneven reduction in hair growth—allowing her to shave less frequently—the results fall short of dramatic transformation, especially given her lighter, greying hair and the presence of a birthmark restricting treatment zones. Despite this, she appreciates the painless, low-effort process and recommends the device primarily for users with pale skin and dark hair. Overall, Doctor Anne’s review balances cautious optimism with realistic expectations, offering valuable guidance for prospective buyers considering at-home laser hair removal.

By Doctor Anne

September 5, 2025Visit Source →
86
Logo of Marie Claire UK

Tori Crowther from Marie Claire UK highlights the CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device as a promising at-home alternative to traditional IPL tools and costly salon treatments. She expresses genuine enthusiasm about its painless, easy-to-use design and notes noticeable hair reduction within just four weeks—faster results than with IPL devices she’s tried. Crowther appreciates the device’s advanced 810nm laser technology, though she candidly points out its limitation for darker skin tones (Fitzpatrick groups 5 and 6). While initially finding the instructions unclear, she quickly adapted and found the treatment routine manageable compared to salon visits. Despite the device’s high price, she recommends it as a worthwhile investment for those seeking a convenient, effective hair removal method without salon appointments. Her review balances excitement with practical caveats, offering a thoughtful, real-world perspective on the device’s performance and usability.

By Tori Crowther

April 7, 2024Visit Source →
88
Logo of Expert Reviews

Sarah Matthews from Expert Reviews highlights the CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device as a groundbreaking at-home solution that delivers powerful, permanent laser treatments previously only available in salons. Praising its painless operation, blisteringly fast flash rate, and superior permanence compared to IPL devices, Matthews emphasizes the device’s ability to achieve smooth, hair-free skin lasting six months post-treatment. She notes the large treatment window and quick session times as major advantages, making full-leg treatments notably faster than competitors. However, Matthews also points out some drawbacks, including a somewhat confusing control scheme, the lack of precision attachments for smaller or sensitive areas, and an awkwardly placed chunky power adapter that restricts movement. The incessant beeping during treatment can be annoying but is manageable. Despite these minor inconveniences and a 90% rather than full money-back guarantee, Matthews considers the £579 price fair given the device’s performance and recommends it enthusiastically for those seeking a fast, effective, and painless laser hair removal option at home.

By Sarah Matthews

September 18, 2024Visit Source →
87
Logo of Women's Health

Brigitt Earley from Women’s Health highlights the CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device as a groundbreaking at-home diode laser, praised for its advanced technology and pain-free use. Unlike typical IPL devices, this concentrated 810-nanometer laser offers faster, more effective hair reduction, with noticeable results within weeks. Earley appreciates its intuitive design, ease of use, and versatility across body areas, noting a significant decrease in hair growth and thinner regrowth. While the device is heavier than some competitors and carries a steep price tag of $759, Earley finds the investment worthwhile for the time saved between professional treatments. She also underscores the device’s limited suitability for the darkest skin tones, reflecting current safety precautions. Overall, Earley’s review conveys genuine enthusiasm tempered by thoughtful caveats, emphasizing the device’s promising innovation and potential for broader skin tone compatibility in future iterations.

By Brigitt Earley

November 27, 2024Visit Source →
Play TV Icon

YouTube

2 LEADING EXPERT & INFLUENCER REVIEWS


57
Youtube IconHelen Avery

Helen Avery is deeply disappointed, reporting no visible hair reduction after eight weeks of careful use. She followed the instructions, used the highest intensity, and even compared treated and untreated legs, finding them indistinguishable. The device was generally painless, sturdy, attractive, and seemingly well suited to her light skin and dark hair, but its one-button controls caused considerable confusion. Avery acknowledges she may need the full three months, yet worries the 60-day return window could expire before results appear. Although CurrentBody provided the device and she likes the brand, she cannot recommend it unless performance improves.

June 27, 2025
84
Youtube IconBeauty Beyond 40

Trina is highly enthusiastic about CurrentBody’s diode laser and prefers it to IPL for faster, easier hair reduction. After years of IPL use, she reports finishing touch-up sessions in under 10 minutes, with especially improved coverage around her knees, plus comfortable treatment at the highest setting thanks to Ice Cooling Technology. She appreciates the simple stamping or gliding operation and believes the device produces more lasting results with fewer maintenance treatments. Her caveats are important: it is relatively expensive and heavy, cannot treat very light hair or darker skin tones safely, and requires frequent early sessions. Disclosure: her purchase links are affiliate links, though she states the video is unsponsored.

June 20, 2024
Forum Icon

Forum Reviews

CUSTOMER REVIEWS FROM 1 FORUM


65
Logo of Reddit

Reddit users express mixed feelings about the CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device, with some appreciating its design and the concept of a home laser device, while others report disappointing performance and lack of visible results even after consistent use. Several users highlight concerns about the device’s low fluence compared to professional treatments, questioning its effectiveness on stubborn hair. Safety worries also arise, particularly regarding reported skin sagging, though some experts dispute these claims. New shoppers tend to be skeptical and seek more information before purchasing, whereas those considering upgrades weigh the device’s features against its price and efficacy, often favoring more established brands.

Many comments

Scales Icon

In-Depth Review

Highlights Icon

Highlights

  • •
    Comfortable cooling treatment
    Reviewers often found highest settings painless.
  • •
    Targeted diode laser
    Marketed as faster and more lasting than IPL.
  • •
    Quick treatment coverage
    Designed for short sessions across larger areas.
  • •
    Reduced shaving frequency
    Reviewers reported slower, thinner regrowth.
Considerations Icon

Considerations

  • •
    Variable hair reduction
    Some saw no change after eight weeks.
  • •
    Limited skin hair range
    Not suitable for darker skin or light hair.
  • •
    Premium upfront cost
    Its price exceeds many IPL alternatives.
  • •
    Unclear one-button controls
    Instructions and setting changes confused reviewers.

CurrentBody is positioning this premium home device as a more clinic-like alternative to conventional IPL, though real-world feedback remains limited and mixed. Its purpose is straightforward: reduce regrowth at home for users with pale-to-medium skin and dark hair, using a 810nm diode laser rather than broad-spectrum IPL. The sections ahead examine what that means in practice, from claimed reduction and compatibility safeguards to the Ice Cooling Technology that helps keep treatments comfortable. We’ll also consider the 30 × 10mm treatment window, six power settings and sometimes-confusing one-button controls, plus the practical value of a five-year flash lifespan. Those details matter especially if you’re comparing it with cheaper IPL models, treating sensitive areas, or hoping to avoid salon visits. Check the evidence and limitations closely—because the right wavelength is only half the hair-removal story.

CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device

Safety And Compatibility

Compatibility matters more here than with a typical grooming device. The system is intended for Fitzpatrick I–IV skin and light-brown-to-black hair, while white, gray, red, and very light hair may not respond. Its contact sensor and compatibility check prevent flashing unless the head sits flush against suitable skin, adding an important safety layer. That does not eliminate risk, especially on darker skin, birthmarks, or curved areas. Check the manufacturer’s guidance carefully before treating, since incorrect use can cause burns or pigmentation changes.

Five-Year Flash Lifespan

The claimed five-year flash lifespan supports the device’s premium positioning. Because there are no replacement cartridges or subscription fees, the main ongoing cost is your initial purchase, making repeated home treatments potentially cheaper than salon visits. Longevity is useful only if the device produces worthwhile reduction for your hair and skin combination, however. Its high price, limited compatibility, and mixed early reports mean durability alone does not prove value. Consider the return policy carefully before relying on long-term savings.

Controls And Intensity

Six intensity levels let you begin cautiously and increase power as your skin adapts. The one-button control keeps the basic workflow simple, while the skin sensor, pulse beep, and pink or red light confirm contact and firing. In practice, the controls are not entirely intuitive: some reviewers found the instructions and setting changes confusing, and constant beeping can become irritating during larger treatments. Starting at Level 1 with a test pulse is sensible, but the interface could communicate treatment status more clearly.

810nm Laser Performance

The 810nm diode laser is the device’s main advantage, but results are not guaranteed. It delivers targeted follicle heating at a reported 7.0 J/cm², which is more concentrated than IPL’s broad-spectrum light. CurrentBody claims up to 82% hair-count reduction in eight weeks, and some reviewers noticed slower, thinner regrowth within four weeks. However, testing is mixed: one reviewer saw no change after eight weeks, while another reported uneven reduction after six months. Expect gradual maintenance reduction, not salon-level permanence.

CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device

Fast Treatment Coverage

The large 30-by-10mm treatment window helps keep sessions practical. CurrentBody says key areas can be covered in under two minutes, while one reviewer reported completing touch-ups in less than 10 minutes. The broad head is particularly useful on legs and underarms, though curved areas such as knees can require repositioning and careful stamping. Because the unit is corded and relatively heavy, speed does not make every body area effortless. It mainly reduces the repetitive coverage burden compared with smaller IPL windows.

CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device

Ice Cooling Comfort

Ice Cooling Technology is one of the clearest usability strengths. A metal contact cooling plate chills the treatment area as each pulse is delivered, and reviewers commonly describe the process as painless, even at higher settings on underarms and bikini areas. Some users still notice warmth or a brief sting on sensitive zones, so “pain-free” is a brand claim rather than a universal guarantee. Compared with IPL devices that can feel prickly, the cooling system makes regular weekly treatments easier to tolerate.

CurrentBody Skin Laser Hair Removal Device

Conclusion

The research points to a promising but selective investment: CurrentBody’s 810nm diode laser can slow regrowth impressively for suitable users, though results range from noticeable reduction to no visible change. Its Ice Cooling plate keeps pulses unusually comfortable, while the 30 × 10mm window supports quick coverage; six levels and contact indicators add control, even if the one-button interface confuses some testers. The device is best suited to Fitzpatrick I–IV skin with light-brown to black hair—not darker skin or pale, red, gray, blonde, or white hair—and careful patch testing remains essential. Its five-year flash lifespan helps justify the premium price, but does not overcome uncertain efficacy for every person. For the right complexion and hair type, it is a fast, painless salon alternative; for everyone else, the cost and limitations make a cheaper or professional option more sensible.

Feature Scores Icon

Feature Scores

This reflects reviews and ratings from established critics, journalists, and users who have evaluated the item. Their opinions provide a comprehensive assessment.

Performance

Hair Reduction Effectiveness

4/5

Treatment Speed

4/5

Coverage Area Size

4/5

Durability of Results

4/5

Device Reliability and Lifespan

4/5

Energy Output Consistency

3/5

Value

Price to Performance Ratio

4/5

Cost of Ownership

4/5

Warranty and Support

TBD

Design

Ergonomics and Handling

3/5

User Interface Clarity

3/5

Portability and Storage

3/5

Health

Skin Tone Compatibility

3/5

Long Term Skin Health Impact

TBD

Safety

Built In Skin Tone Detection

4/5

Eye Protection and Hazard Controls

4/5

Regulatory Compliance

4/5

Sustainability

Recyclability and Materials

TBD

Energy Efficiency per Treatment

3/5

Experience Style

Customization and Advanced Features

4/5

Ease of Use for Beginners

4/5

Specifications Icon

Specifications

This section outlines the product's key facts, covering essential features, details, dimensions, materials, and any unique characteristics that define its functionality and usability.

Performance

Value

Design

Safety

Sustainability

Experience Style

Question Mark Icon

Frequently Asked Questions


8 Questions


Related icon

Also Consider


2 Options