Tesla Cybertruck (2024)
Rapid, agile, and futuristic with real utility, but range and practicality require compromise.
The Tesla Cybertruck (2024) is a stainless-steel spectacle for drivers who want an electric truck that solves the usual EV compromises with serious towing capability, dramatic acceleration, and Tesla’s charging ecosystem. Its steer-by-wire and rear-wheel steering make the enormous body surprisingly nimble, while the smooth ride, useful outlets, and clever storage add genuine everyday appeal. But Tesla’s range claims are less convincing in practice: highway tests have landed around 224 to 250 miles, and towing can cut that sharply. Owners and experts also flag uneven panel fit, awkward visibility, touchscreen-heavy controls, and a premium price. It suits tech-forward lifestyle buyers more than traditional work-truck users. Overall value depends on how much you prize innovation and spectacle over range, polish, and practicality.
Find Yours
What's your main purpose for an electric truck?
Answer to find your best matches.
The Field
Browse top contenders, or compare all options ranked by score and key attributes.
2 Options
The Scoreboard
Does this improve your life? Considers, health, habits, and environmental impact.
Benefits
Smooth suspension and a quiet cabin make commuting and long drives feel less tiring.
Four-wheel steering makes parking and tight turns easier than this truck’s size suggests.
Instant electric power makes merging, passing, and towing feel calm and controlled.
Reliable Supercharger access simplifies longer trips when chargers are available along your route.
Trade-Offs
Thick pillars, blind spots, and blocked rear glass make lane changes and reversing harder.
Everyday functions live on the touchscreen, so simple adjustments take more attention while driving.
The large body and sloped bed make parking, loading, and reaching cargo inconvenient.
The unusual truck draws looks, comments, and attention during ordinary errands and commutes.
Alternatives
Join the Circle
Where real meets deal
Know what's worth buying-and when.
Tips, special offers, and rewards for buying and sharing.
Publications
11 LEADING PUBLICATION REVIEWS
Car and Driver is impressed by the Cybertruck’s performance but remains clear-eyed about its compromises. The Dual Motor reaches 60 mph in 3.9 seconds, while the 834-hp Beast is extraordinarily quick, completing the sprint in 2.6 seconds and the quarter-mile in 11 seconds. Its agile handling, rear-wheel steering, adjustable air suspension, strong towing ability, and useful cargo space make it more capable than its outlandish design suggests. Still, the Beast managed 250 miles in real-world highway testing—well below Tesla’s 301-mile estimate—and charging took 50 minutes to move from 10 to 50 percent. The stark cabin, missing Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, unfinished promised features, high price, and limited rear-seat comfort also temper the appeal. Overall, it is a remarkably fast, distinctive, and genuinely capable electric truck, but the less expensive Dual Motor is the smarter choice.
By Eric Stafford
Kelley Blue Book’s Colin Ryan is impressed by the Cybertruck’s performance but remains measured about its compromises. The dual-motor truck is exceptionally quick, while the Cyberbeast’s 845 horsepower and 2.6-second sprint are genuinely startling. Its stainless-steel body, rugged glass, useful bed storage, strong towing capacity, off-road-friendly suspension, and access to Tesla’s Supercharger network add real substance beyond the polarizing design. Still, the review points out that range leadership is no longer guaranteed, payload and towing figures fall short of Tesla’s original promises, and large panel gaps undermine the supposedly tough exterior. The sparse cabin, uncertain battery rollout, limited third-party safety data, and potentially high pricing also temper the appeal. Overall, Ryan presents the Cybertruck as a powerful, distinctive, highly capable electric truck—but one whose novelty and engineering do not eliminate practical trade-offs.
By Colin Ryan
Car and Driver is impressed by the Cybertruck’s performance but remains clear-eyed about its compromises. The Dual Motor reaches 60 mph in 3.9 seconds, while the 834-hp Beast is extraordinarily quick, completing the sprint in 2.6 seconds and the quarter-mile in 11 seconds. Its agile handling, rear-wheel steering, adjustable air suspension, strong towing ability, and useful cargo space make it more capable than its outlandish design suggests. Still, the Beast managed 250 miles in real-world highway testing—well below Tesla’s 301-mile estimate—and charging took 50 minutes to move from 10 to 50 percent. The stark cabin, missing Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, unfinished promised features, high price, and limited rear-seat comfort also temper the appeal. Overall, it is a remarkably fast, distinctive, and genuinely capable electric truck, but the less expensive Dual Motor is the smarter choice.
By Eric Stafford
Kelley Blue Book’s Colin Ryan is impressed by the Cybertruck’s performance but remains measured about its compromises. The dual-motor truck is exceptionally quick, while the Cyberbeast’s 845 horsepower and 2.6-second sprint are genuinely startling. Its stainless-steel body, rugged glass, useful bed storage, strong towing capacity, off-road-friendly suspension, and access to Tesla’s Supercharger network add real substance beyond the polarizing design. Still, the review points out that range leadership is no longer guaranteed, payload and towing figures fall short of Tesla’s original promises, and large panel gaps undermine the supposedly tough exterior. The sparse cabin, uncertain battery rollout, limited third-party safety data, and potentially high pricing also temper the appeal. Overall, Ryan presents the Cybertruck as a powerful, distinctive, highly capable electric truck—but one whose novelty and engineering do not eliminate practical trade-offs.
By Colin Ryan
Car and Driver is impressed by the Cybertruck’s performance but remains clear-eyed about its compromises. The Dual Motor reaches 60 mph in 3.9 seconds, while the 834-hp Beast is extraordinarily quick, completing the sprint in 2.6 seconds and the quarter-mile in 11 seconds. Its agile handling, rear-wheel steering, adjustable air suspension, strong towing ability, and useful cargo space make it more capable than its outlandish design suggests. Still, the Beast managed 250 miles in real-world highway testing—well below Tesla’s 301-mile estimate—and charging took 50 minutes to move from 10 to 50 percent. The stark cabin, missing Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, unfinished promised features, high price, and limited rear-seat comfort also temper the appeal. Overall, it is a remarkably fast, distinctive, and genuinely capable electric truck, but the less expensive Dual Motor is the smarter choice.
By Eric Stafford
Kelley Blue Book’s Colin Ryan is impressed by the Cybertruck’s performance but remains measured about its compromises. The dual-motor truck is exceptionally quick, while the Cyberbeast’s 845 horsepower and 2.6-second sprint are genuinely startling. Its stainless-steel body, rugged glass, useful bed storage, strong towing capacity, off-road-friendly suspension, and access to Tesla’s Supercharger network add real substance beyond the polarizing design. Still, the review points out that range leadership is no longer guaranteed, payload and towing figures fall short of Tesla’s original promises, and large panel gaps undermine the supposedly tough exterior. The sparse cabin, uncertain battery rollout, limited third-party safety data, and potentially high pricing also temper the appeal. Overall, Ryan presents the Cybertruck as a powerful, distinctive, highly capable electric truck—but one whose novelty and engineering do not eliminate practical trade-offs.
By Colin Ryan
Car and Driver is impressed by the Cybertruck’s performance but remains clear-eyed about its compromises. The Dual Motor reaches 60 mph in 3.9 seconds, while the 834-hp Beast is extraordinarily quick, completing the sprint in 2.6 seconds and the quarter-mile in 11 seconds. Its agile handling, rear-wheel steering, adjustable air suspension, strong towing ability, and useful cargo space make it more capable than its outlandish design suggests. Still, the Beast managed 250 miles in real-world highway testing—well below Tesla’s 301-mile estimate—and charging took 50 minutes to move from 10 to 50 percent. The stark cabin, missing Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, unfinished promised features, high price, and limited rear-seat comfort also temper the appeal. Overall, it is a remarkably fast, distinctive, and genuinely capable electric truck, but the less expensive Dual Motor is the smarter choice.
By Eric Stafford
Kelley Blue Book’s Colin Ryan is impressed by the Cybertruck’s performance but remains measured about its compromises. The dual-motor truck is exceptionally quick, while the Cyberbeast’s 845 horsepower and 2.6-second sprint are genuinely startling. Its stainless-steel body, rugged glass, useful bed storage, strong towing capacity, off-road-friendly suspension, and access to Tesla’s Supercharger network add real substance beyond the polarizing design. Still, the review points out that range leadership is no longer guaranteed, payload and towing figures fall short of Tesla’s original promises, and large panel gaps undermine the supposedly tough exterior. The sparse cabin, uncertain battery rollout, limited third-party safety data, and potentially high pricing also temper the appeal. Overall, Ryan presents the Cybertruck as a powerful, distinctive, highly capable electric truck—but one whose novelty and engineering do not eliminate practical trade-offs.
By Colin Ryan
Car and Driver is impressed by the Cybertruck’s performance but remains clear-eyed about its compromises. The Dual Motor reaches 60 mph in 3.9 seconds, while the 834-hp Beast is extraordinarily quick, completing the sprint in 2.6 seconds and the quarter-mile in 11 seconds. Its agile handling, rear-wheel steering, adjustable air suspension, strong towing ability, and useful cargo space make it more capable than its outlandish design suggests. Still, the Beast managed 250 miles in real-world highway testing—well below Tesla’s 301-mile estimate—and charging took 50 minutes to move from 10 to 50 percent. The stark cabin, missing Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, unfinished promised features, high price, and limited rear-seat comfort also temper the appeal. Overall, it is a remarkably fast, distinctive, and genuinely capable electric truck, but the less expensive Dual Motor is the smarter choice.
By Eric Stafford
Kelley Blue Book’s Colin Ryan is impressed by the Cybertruck’s performance but remains measured about its compromises. The dual-motor truck is exceptionally quick, while the Cyberbeast’s 845 horsepower and 2.6-second sprint are genuinely startling. Its stainless-steel body, rugged glass, useful bed storage, strong towing capacity, off-road-friendly suspension, and access to Tesla’s Supercharger network add real substance beyond the polarizing design. Still, the review points out that range leadership is no longer guaranteed, payload and towing figures fall short of Tesla’s original promises, and large panel gaps undermine the supposedly tough exterior. The sparse cabin, uncertain battery rollout, limited third-party safety data, and potentially high pricing also temper the appeal. Overall, Ryan presents the Cybertruck as a powerful, distinctive, highly capable electric truck—but one whose novelty and engineering do not eliminate practical trade-offs.
By Colin Ryan
Car and Driver is impressed by the Cybertruck’s performance but remains clear-eyed about its compromises. The Dual Motor reaches 60 mph in 3.9 seconds, while the 834-hp Beast is extraordinarily quick, completing the sprint in 2.6 seconds and the quarter-mile in 11 seconds. Its agile handling, rear-wheel steering, adjustable air suspension, strong towing ability, and useful cargo space make it more capable than its outlandish design suggests. Still, the Beast managed 250 miles in real-world highway testing—well below Tesla’s 301-mile estimate—and charging took 50 minutes to move from 10 to 50 percent. The stark cabin, missing Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, unfinished promised features, high price, and limited rear-seat comfort also temper the appeal. Overall, it is a remarkably fast, distinctive, and genuinely capable electric truck, but the less expensive Dual Motor is the smarter choice.
By Eric Stafford
Kelley Blue Book’s Colin Ryan is impressed by the Cybertruck’s performance but remains measured about its compromises. The dual-motor truck is exceptionally quick, while the Cyberbeast’s 845 horsepower and 2.6-second sprint are genuinely startling. Its stainless-steel body, rugged glass, useful bed storage, strong towing capacity, off-road-friendly suspension, and access to Tesla’s Supercharger network add real substance beyond the polarizing design. Still, the review points out that range leadership is no longer guaranteed, payload and towing figures fall short of Tesla’s original promises, and large panel gaps undermine the supposedly tough exterior. The sparse cabin, uncertain battery rollout, limited third-party safety data, and potentially high pricing also temper the appeal. Overall, Ryan presents the Cybertruck as a powerful, distinctive, highly capable electric truck—but one whose novelty and engineering do not eliminate practical trade-offs.
By Colin Ryan
YouTube
20 LEADING EXPERT & INFLUENCER REVIEWS
Auto Buyers Guide | Alex on AutosAlex on Autos is intrigued by the Cybertruck’s engineering but ultimately finds it an only-okay truck. He praises its striking design, quick acceleration, comfortable seats, smooth adaptive-air-suspension ride, tight turning circle, efficient powertrain, and excellent Tesla infotainment. However, the angular unibody sacrifices bed and frunk practicality, rear visibility, cabin width, and traditional truck versatility. Range appears closer to the Ford F-150 Lightning in real-world driving than Tesla’s headline 340 miles, while road noise, unusual steer-by-wire feel, small controls, and unfinished software temper the appeal. It’s an impressive technology statement, but not a clear conventional-truck replacement.
Marques BrownleeMarques Brownlee is strongly impressed by the Cybertruck, though he sees it as more fascinating than practical. After a month and over 1,500 miles, he praises its remarkably agile steer-by-wire handling, dramatic acceleration, adaptive suspension, quiet cabin, and unmistakable visual impact. He also calls the stainless-steel durability, conventional truck capability, minimalist controls, limited tire choice, early build issues, missing features, and mediocre efficiency overrated or frustrating. His key insight is that the Cybertruck’s biggest effect is social: it generates curiosity, excitement, and disgust wherever it goes. Brownlee considers it already iconic, but wonders whether mass production will eventually make it ordinary.
Auto Buyers Guide | Alex on AutosAlex on Autos is intrigued by the Cybertruck’s engineering but ultimately finds it an only-okay truck. He praises its striking design, quick acceleration, comfortable seats, smooth adaptive-air-suspension ride, tight turning circle, efficient powertrain, and excellent Tesla infotainment. However, the angular unibody sacrifices bed and frunk practicality, rear visibility, cabin width, and traditional truck versatility. Range appears closer to the Ford F-150 Lightning in real-world driving than Tesla’s headline 340 miles, while road noise, unusual steer-by-wire feel, small controls, and unfinished software temper the appeal. It’s an impressive technology statement, but not a clear conventional-truck replacement.
Marques BrownleeMarques Brownlee is strongly impressed by the Cybertruck, though he sees it as more fascinating than practical. After a month and over 1,500 miles, he praises its remarkably agile steer-by-wire handling, dramatic acceleration, adaptive suspension, quiet cabin, and unmistakable visual impact. He also calls the stainless-steel durability, conventional truck capability, minimalist controls, limited tire choice, early build issues, missing features, and mediocre efficiency overrated or frustrating. His key insight is that the Cybertruck’s biggest effect is social: it generates curiosity, excitement, and disgust wherever it goes. Brownlee considers it already iconic, but wonders whether mass production will eventually make it ordinary.
Auto Buyers Guide | Alex on AutosAlex on Autos is intrigued by the Cybertruck’s engineering but ultimately finds it an only-okay truck. He praises its striking design, quick acceleration, comfortable seats, smooth adaptive-air-suspension ride, tight turning circle, efficient powertrain, and excellent Tesla infotainment. However, the angular unibody sacrifices bed and frunk practicality, rear visibility, cabin width, and traditional truck versatility. Range appears closer to the Ford F-150 Lightning in real-world driving than Tesla’s headline 340 miles, while road noise, unusual steer-by-wire feel, small controls, and unfinished software temper the appeal. It’s an impressive technology statement, but not a clear conventional-truck replacement.
Marques BrownleeMarques Brownlee is strongly impressed by the Cybertruck, though he sees it as more fascinating than practical. After a month and over 1,500 miles, he praises its remarkably agile steer-by-wire handling, dramatic acceleration, adaptive suspension, quiet cabin, and unmistakable visual impact. He also calls the stainless-steel durability, conventional truck capability, minimalist controls, limited tire choice, early build issues, missing features, and mediocre efficiency overrated or frustrating. His key insight is that the Cybertruck’s biggest effect is social: it generates curiosity, excitement, and disgust wherever it goes. Brownlee considers it already iconic, but wonders whether mass production will eventually make it ordinary.
Auto Buyers Guide | Alex on AutosAlex on Autos is intrigued by the Cybertruck’s engineering but ultimately finds it an only-okay truck. He praises its striking design, quick acceleration, comfortable seats, smooth adaptive-air-suspension ride, tight turning circle, efficient powertrain, and excellent Tesla infotainment. However, the angular unibody sacrifices bed and frunk practicality, rear visibility, cabin width, and traditional truck versatility. Range appears closer to the Ford F-150 Lightning in real-world driving than Tesla’s headline 340 miles, while road noise, unusual steer-by-wire feel, small controls, and unfinished software temper the appeal. It’s an impressive technology statement, but not a clear conventional-truck replacement.
Marques BrownleeMarques Brownlee is strongly impressed by the Cybertruck, though he sees it as more fascinating than practical. After a month and over 1,500 miles, he praises its remarkably agile steer-by-wire handling, dramatic acceleration, adaptive suspension, quiet cabin, and unmistakable visual impact. He also calls the stainless-steel durability, conventional truck capability, minimalist controls, limited tire choice, early build issues, missing features, and mediocre efficiency overrated or frustrating. His key insight is that the Cybertruck’s biggest effect is social: it generates curiosity, excitement, and disgust wherever it goes. Brownlee considers it already iconic, but wonders whether mass production will eventually make it ordinary.
Auto Buyers Guide | Alex on AutosAlex on Autos is intrigued by the Cybertruck’s engineering but ultimately finds it an only-okay truck. He praises its striking design, quick acceleration, comfortable seats, smooth adaptive-air-suspension ride, tight turning circle, efficient powertrain, and excellent Tesla infotainment. However, the angular unibody sacrifices bed and frunk practicality, rear visibility, cabin width, and traditional truck versatility. Range appears closer to the Ford F-150 Lightning in real-world driving than Tesla’s headline 340 miles, while road noise, unusual steer-by-wire feel, small controls, and unfinished software temper the appeal. It’s an impressive technology statement, but not a clear conventional-truck replacement.
Marques BrownleeMarques Brownlee is strongly impressed by the Cybertruck, though he sees it as more fascinating than practical. After a month and over 1,500 miles, he praises its remarkably agile steer-by-wire handling, dramatic acceleration, adaptive suspension, quiet cabin, and unmistakable visual impact. He also calls the stainless-steel durability, conventional truck capability, minimalist controls, limited tire choice, early build issues, missing features, and mediocre efficiency overrated or frustrating. His key insight is that the Cybertruck’s biggest effect is social: it generates curiosity, excitement, and disgust wherever it goes. Brownlee considers it already iconic, but wonders whether mass production will eventually make it ordinary.
Auto Buyers Guide | Alex on AutosAlex on Autos is intrigued by the Cybertruck’s engineering but ultimately finds it an only-okay truck. He praises its striking design, quick acceleration, comfortable seats, smooth adaptive-air-suspension ride, tight turning circle, efficient powertrain, and excellent Tesla infotainment. However, the angular unibody sacrifices bed and frunk practicality, rear visibility, cabin width, and traditional truck versatility. Range appears closer to the Ford F-150 Lightning in real-world driving than Tesla’s headline 340 miles, while road noise, unusual steer-by-wire feel, small controls, and unfinished software temper the appeal. It’s an impressive technology statement, but not a clear conventional-truck replacement.
Marques BrownleeMarques Brownlee is strongly impressed by the Cybertruck, though he sees it as more fascinating than practical. After a month and over 1,500 miles, he praises its remarkably agile steer-by-wire handling, dramatic acceleration, adaptive suspension, quiet cabin, and unmistakable visual impact. He also calls the stainless-steel durability, conventional truck capability, minimalist controls, limited tire choice, early build issues, missing features, and mediocre efficiency overrated or frustrating. His key insight is that the Cybertruck’s biggest effect is social: it generates curiosity, excitement, and disgust wherever it goes. Brownlee considers it already iconic, but wonders whether mass production will eventually make it ordinary.
Auto Buyers Guide | Alex on AutosAlex on Autos is intrigued by the Cybertruck’s engineering but ultimately finds it an only-okay truck. He praises its striking design, quick acceleration, comfortable seats, smooth adaptive-air-suspension ride, tight turning circle, efficient powertrain, and excellent Tesla infotainment. However, the angular unibody sacrifices bed and frunk practicality, rear visibility, cabin width, and traditional truck versatility. Range appears closer to the Ford F-150 Lightning in real-world driving than Tesla’s headline 340 miles, while road noise, unusual steer-by-wire feel, small controls, and unfinished software temper the appeal. It’s an impressive technology statement, but not a clear conventional-truck replacement.
Marques BrownleeMarques Brownlee is strongly impressed by the Cybertruck, though he sees it as more fascinating than practical. After a month and over 1,500 miles, he praises its remarkably agile steer-by-wire handling, dramatic acceleration, adaptive suspension, quiet cabin, and unmistakable visual impact. He also calls the stainless-steel durability, conventional truck capability, minimalist controls, limited tire choice, early build issues, missing features, and mediocre efficiency overrated or frustrating. His key insight is that the Cybertruck’s biggest effect is social: it generates curiosity, excitement, and disgust wherever it goes. Brownlee considers it already iconic, but wonders whether mass production will eventually make it ordinary.
Auto Buyers Guide | Alex on AutosAlex on Autos is intrigued by the Cybertruck’s engineering but ultimately finds it an only-okay truck. He praises its striking design, quick acceleration, comfortable seats, smooth adaptive-air-suspension ride, tight turning circle, efficient powertrain, and excellent Tesla infotainment. However, the angular unibody sacrifices bed and frunk practicality, rear visibility, cabin width, and traditional truck versatility. Range appears closer to the Ford F-150 Lightning in real-world driving than Tesla’s headline 340 miles, while road noise, unusual steer-by-wire feel, small controls, and unfinished software temper the appeal. It’s an impressive technology statement, but not a clear conventional-truck replacement.
Marques BrownleeMarques Brownlee is strongly impressed by the Cybertruck, though he sees it as more fascinating than practical. After a month and over 1,500 miles, he praises its remarkably agile steer-by-wire handling, dramatic acceleration, adaptive suspension, quiet cabin, and unmistakable visual impact. He also calls the stainless-steel durability, conventional truck capability, minimalist controls, limited tire choice, early build issues, missing features, and mediocre efficiency overrated or frustrating. His key insight is that the Cybertruck’s biggest effect is social: it generates curiosity, excitement, and disgust wherever it goes. Brownlee considers it already iconic, but wonders whether mass production will eventually make it ordinary.
Auto Buyers Guide | Alex on AutosAlex on Autos is intrigued by the Cybertruck’s engineering but ultimately finds it an only-okay truck. He praises its striking design, quick acceleration, comfortable seats, smooth adaptive-air-suspension ride, tight turning circle, efficient powertrain, and excellent Tesla infotainment. However, the angular unibody sacrifices bed and frunk practicality, rear visibility, cabin width, and traditional truck versatility. Range appears closer to the Ford F-150 Lightning in real-world driving than Tesla’s headline 340 miles, while road noise, unusual steer-by-wire feel, small controls, and unfinished software temper the appeal. It’s an impressive technology statement, but not a clear conventional-truck replacement.
Marques BrownleeMarques Brownlee is strongly impressed by the Cybertruck, though he sees it as more fascinating than practical. After a month and over 1,500 miles, he praises its remarkably agile steer-by-wire handling, dramatic acceleration, adaptive suspension, quiet cabin, and unmistakable visual impact. He also calls the stainless-steel durability, conventional truck capability, minimalist controls, limited tire choice, early build issues, missing features, and mediocre efficiency overrated or frustrating. His key insight is that the Cybertruck’s biggest effect is social: it generates curiosity, excitement, and disgust wherever it goes. Brownlee considers it already iconic, but wonders whether mass production will eventually make it ordinary.
Auto Buyers Guide | Alex on AutosAlex on Autos is intrigued by the Cybertruck’s engineering but ultimately finds it an only-okay truck. He praises its striking design, quick acceleration, comfortable seats, smooth adaptive-air-suspension ride, tight turning circle, efficient powertrain, and excellent Tesla infotainment. However, the angular unibody sacrifices bed and frunk practicality, rear visibility, cabin width, and traditional truck versatility. Range appears closer to the Ford F-150 Lightning in real-world driving than Tesla’s headline 340 miles, while road noise, unusual steer-by-wire feel, small controls, and unfinished software temper the appeal. It’s an impressive technology statement, but not a clear conventional-truck replacement.
Marques BrownleeMarques Brownlee is strongly impressed by the Cybertruck, though he sees it as more fascinating than practical. After a month and over 1,500 miles, he praises its remarkably agile steer-by-wire handling, dramatic acceleration, adaptive suspension, quiet cabin, and unmistakable visual impact. He also calls the stainless-steel durability, conventional truck capability, minimalist controls, limited tire choice, early build issues, missing features, and mediocre efficiency overrated or frustrating. His key insight is that the Cybertruck’s biggest effect is social: it generates curiosity, excitement, and disgust wherever it goes. Brownlee considers it already iconic, but wonders whether mass production will eventually make it ordinary.
Social
6 INFLUENCER REVIEWS
Malty AutomotiveMalty Automotive is cautiously mixed on the 2024 Tesla Cybertruck, balancing clever features with practical deal-breakers. Four-wheel steering, adjustable ride height with up to 16 inches of clearance, and an automatic tonneau cover with LED lighting are appealing. However, the limited steering angle, difficult-to-repair stainless-steel body, and blocked rear visibility when the cover is raised create notable frustrations. The playful “take my money” versus “absolutely not” framing feels more skeptical than enthusiastic, ultimately inviting viewers to decide whether the compromises are worth it.
DelivrdTomislav Mikula is highly enthusiastic about the Cybertruck, despite several serious flaws. He loves its sharp handling from steer-by-wire and rear-wheel steering, its exceptionally responsive center screen, and practical storage beneath the rear seats and bed. He also acknowledges the $101,985 price, lack of Apple CarPlay, and the need to wrap the vehicle. More troubling are the poor build quality, an extreme panel gap, and rust appearing in the wheel well after just one day. Still, his excitement dominates, and he strongly urges skeptics to drive one before judging it.
Malty AutomotiveMalty Automotive is cautiously mixed on the 2024 Tesla Cybertruck, balancing clever features with practical deal-breakers. Four-wheel steering, adjustable ride height with up to 16 inches of clearance, and an automatic tonneau cover with LED lighting are appealing. However, the limited steering angle, difficult-to-repair stainless-steel body, and blocked rear visibility when the cover is raised create notable frustrations. The playful “take my money” versus “absolutely not” framing feels more skeptical than enthusiastic, ultimately inviting viewers to decide whether the compromises are worth it.
DelivrdTomislav Mikula is highly enthusiastic about the Cybertruck, despite several serious flaws. He loves its sharp handling from steer-by-wire and rear-wheel steering, its exceptionally responsive center screen, and practical storage beneath the rear seats and bed. He also acknowledges the $101,985 price, lack of Apple CarPlay, and the need to wrap the vehicle. More troubling are the poor build quality, an extreme panel gap, and rust appearing in the wheel well after just one day. Still, his excitement dominates, and he strongly urges skeptics to drive one before judging it.
Malty AutomotiveMalty Automotive is cautiously mixed on the 2024 Tesla Cybertruck, balancing clever features with practical deal-breakers. Four-wheel steering, adjustable ride height with up to 16 inches of clearance, and an automatic tonneau cover with LED lighting are appealing. However, the limited steering angle, difficult-to-repair stainless-steel body, and blocked rear visibility when the cover is raised create notable frustrations. The playful “take my money” versus “absolutely not” framing feels more skeptical than enthusiastic, ultimately inviting viewers to decide whether the compromises are worth it.
DelivrdTomislav Mikula is highly enthusiastic about the Cybertruck, despite several serious flaws. He loves its sharp handling from steer-by-wire and rear-wheel steering, its exceptionally responsive center screen, and practical storage beneath the rear seats and bed. He also acknowledges the $101,985 price, lack of Apple CarPlay, and the need to wrap the vehicle. More troubling are the poor build quality, an extreme panel gap, and rust appearing in the wheel well after just one day. Still, his excitement dominates, and he strongly urges skeptics to drive one before judging it.
Forum Reviews
CUSTOMER REVIEWS FROM 1 FORUM
Redditors are broadly skeptical of the 2024 Cybertruck, despite recognizing its impressive capability. Its acceleration, range, efficiency, towing, off-road hardware, practicality, and striking road presence earn genuine praise, with some owners or prospective buyers calling it Tesla’s best vehicle. Still, the polarizing design, recalls, build concerns, brand controversy, steep depreciation, and questionable value dominate discussion. Cheaper trims are especially criticized for stripping away suspension, outlets, charging functionality, comfort, audio, and signature features while retaining a luxury price. The consensus is that it is technically impressive and emotionally distinctive, but too compromised and expensive for most shoppers.
Many comments
In-Depth Review
Highlights
- •Rapid Electric PerformanceCyberbeast reaches 60 mph in 2.6 seconds.
- •Agile Steering ResponseDesigned to improve maneuverability with rear steering.
- •Smooth Adaptive RideAir suspension delivers a comfortable, composed ride.
- •Connected Charging NetworkCompany highlights Supercharger access and route planning.
Considerations
- •Range Falls ShortHighway tests reached 224–250 miles.
- •Loading And TowingTrailer use sharply reduces range; access is awkward.
- •Inconsistent Panel FitReports include gaps, rippling, squeaks, and corrosion.
- •Limited Rear VisibilityTonneau cover and thick pillars hinder sightlines.
Tesla’s Cybertruck turns the company’s software-and-charging reputation into a radically styled electric pickup. Positioned against the Ford F-150 Lightning and Rivian R1T, it serves commuters, adventurers, and performance-minded owners who want instant electric acceleration, unusual road presence, and genuine truck capability. Its appeal rests on more than spectacle: steer-by-wire and rear-wheel steering make the large body surprisingly nimble, while the bed, outlets, and up-to-11,000-pound tow rating support real utility. Yet advertised range can diverge sharply from highway results, charging is competitive rather than class-leading, and early vehicles have raised questions about panel fit and build quality. The stainless-steel body also brings visibility, loading, and touchscreen-ergonomic compromises, especially compared with more conventional rivals. Buyers should weigh real-world range and towing needs carefully before choosing the Cyberbeast’s speed or the AWD model’s balance. It’s a fascinating truck—but the sharper the edges, the more carefully you should inspect them.
Driving Performance
The Cybertruck feels far more agile than its size suggests. Its steer-by-wire system and rear-wheel steering create a tight turning circle and surprisingly easy low-speed maneuvering, while the AWD model reaches 60 mph in roughly 4.1 seconds and the Cyberbeast does it in 2.6. Adaptive air suspension also delivers a smooth ride in favorable conditions. The trade-off is an initially unfamiliar steering response, a heavy-feeling accelerator for some drivers, and a truck that remains difficult to place in narrow spaces.
Real-World Range
Tesla advertises up to 340 miles of EPA range, but testing suggests a more variable picture. Car and Driver recorded about 250 highway miles in the Cyberbeast, while MotorTrend managed only 224 miles in highway testing; owner reports often land around 280–320 miles depending on weather, speed, and configuration. That is usable for commuting, but towing can roughly halve range, making the Cybertruck less dependable for long-distance hauling than its headline figure suggests.
Towing And Cargo
The truck’s 11,000-pound maximum towing rating is serious on paper, and its six-foot bed, powered tonneau, frunk, under-seat storage, outlets, and vehicle-to-load capability provide useful everyday flexibility. Reviewers generally found the bed practical, but the sloped roof, narrow access, and tonneau obstruction complicate loading. More importantly, towing can dramatically reduce range, and trailer charging alignment is awkward. It works well for lighter recreational hauling, but heavy-duty users may still want a conventional truck alongside it.
Charging Performance
Tesla’s Supercharger network remains a genuine advantage, but the Cybertruck is not a charging leader in every test. Its 800-volt architecture supports DC charging up to about 250 kW, and testing commonly found roughly 42–50 minutes for partial or broad fast-charge sessions, depending on the starting state and charger. That is convenient when route coverage is good, yet reviewers describe performance as merely competitive. Towing adds another complication, since trailer positioning and reduced range can make charging stops slower and less convenient.
Build Quality Concerns
The stainless-steel exoskeleton is a memorable design feature, but early production quality has been inconsistent. Reviewers and owners have reported large panel gaps, rippling, squeaks, trim problems, and occasional rust or wheel-area corrosion concerns, although not every vehicle shows the same issues. The unpainted steel also highlights fingerprints and is difficult to repair conventionally, while Tesla’s claims of toughness do not guarantee flawless assembly. This matters because the truck’s premium pricing raises expectations for fit, finish, and long-term ownership confidence.
Visibility And Ergonomics
The Cybertruck is easier to drive than its dimensions imply, but visibility and controls require adjustment. Its poor rear visibility worsens when the powered tonneau is closed, while thick pillars, blind spots, unusual mirrors, and no conventional driver display complicate lane changes and reversing. Much of the cabin, including basic functions, is managed through a central touchscreen, and the steering-wheel buttons and drive controls have a learning curve. Comfortable seats and excellent cameras help, but the ergonomics are less intuitive than those of established pickups.
Conclusion
The Cybertruck’s final verdict is less “traditional pickup” and more technology showcase with real trade-offs. Its startling acceleration, steer-by-wire agility, and smooth suspension make this oversized truck surprisingly easy and enjoyable to drive, while the bed, outlets, and strong tow rating provide genuine utility. But highway range can fall to 224–250 miles, towing reduces it sharply, and charging is competitive rather than class-leading. Early panel-fit concerns, fingerprints, and reported trim issues also clash with its premium positioning. Add limited rear visibility, thick blind spots, and touchscreen-heavy controls, and everyday use demands patience. It suits Tesla loyalists, performance-focused buyers, and lifestyle owners who value attention and innovation more than maximum practicality. For conventional work, long-distance towing, or polished ergonomics, rivals make more sense; for spectacle backed by genuine capability, the Cybertruck is compelling—but its compromises justify a cautious recommendation.
Feature Scores
This reflects reviews and ratings from established critics, journalists, and users who have evaluated the item. Their opinions provide a comprehensive assessment.
Performance
Towing Capacity
4/5
Payload Capacity
4/5
Driving Range
3/5
Charging Speed
3/5
Acceleration
5/5
Durability and Reliability
2/5
Value
Purchase Price Relative to Features
2/5
Total Cost of Ownership
3/5
Incentive and Tax Benefit Availability
TBD
Resale Value
2/5
Design
Cabin Comfort
4/5
Interior Ergonomics
3/5
Bed and Cargo Utility
3/5
Health
Cabin Air Quality
TBD
Interior Material Health
TBD
Safety
Crashworthiness
TBD
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
3/5
Battery Thermal Management
4/5
Towing Safety Systems
TBD
Sustainability
Manufacturing Carbon Footprint
TBD
Battery End-of-Life Recycling
TBD
Energy Efficiency and Operational Emissions
3/5
Experience Style
User Interface Intuitiveness
4/5
Software Updates and Feature Expansion
4/5
Charging Network Integration and Route Planning
4/5
Specifications
This section outlines the product's key facts, covering essential features, details, dimensions, materials, and any unique characteristics that define its functionality and usability.
Performance
Value
Design
Safety
Experience Style
Frequently Asked Questions
4 Questions
Find Yours
What's your main purpose for an electric truck?
Answer to find your best matches.
