
INFINITI Q50 (2024)
Powerful V6 performance, comfortable seats, and classic styling, though dated and less refined.
The INFINITI Q50 (2024) is a charismatic throwback for drivers who want a real sedan, strong passing power, and a break from underpowered turbo-four rivals. Its headline feature, the 300-hp twin-turbo V6, rises to 400 hp in Red Sport 400 form, and owners praise the smooth acceleration, comfortable front seats, and distinctive styling. Infiniti’s tech package sounds current, but the aging dual-screen infotainment and analog cabin reveal the car’s decade-old roots. Experts also find the ride unsettled and the steering numb, while turbo and electronic repairs can make used bargains less predictable. At roughly $43,000 new, or often much less used, it offers compelling muscle rather than modern polish. Overall value depends on maintenance history, discount, and tolerance for dated refinement.

Find Yours
What is your primary use for a gas-powered sedan or compact?
Answer to find your best matches.
The Scoreboard
Does this improve your life? Considers, health, habits, and environmental impact.

Join the Circle
Where real meets deal
Know what's worth buying-and when.
Tips, special offers, and rewards for buying and sharing.
Publications
1 LEADING PUBLICATION REVIEWS
Edmunds’ Dan Frio views the 2024 Infiniti Q50 as a dated sedan with a few worthwhile strengths. Its smooth, powerful turbocharged V6 delivers brisk acceleration, returning 25 mpg on Edmunds’ test route, while the front seats are comfortable and the styling has aged reasonably well. But a decade without meaningful development shows: the ride is jarring, road noise is intrusive, braking trails competitors, and the numb steering undermines any sporting appeal. The interior’s awkward dual-screen setup, glitchy navigation, confusing controls, mediocre storage, and overly sensitive driver aids are especially disappointing. The Q50 offers decent value through its power, style, and standard features, yet it falls well short of modern luxury sedans in refinement, technology, and execution. Frio’s overall impression is one of frustration: there may still be a good chassis underneath, but Infiniti’s neglect has left it feeling unfinished and increasingly irrelevant.
By Dan Frio
YouTube
10 LEADING EXPERT & INFLUENCER REVIEWS
The Fast Lane Car is impressed by the Q50 Red Sport 400, but stops short of recommending it outright. They praise its powerful 400-hp twin-turbo V6, aggressive exhaust note, distinctive exterior, quick acceleration, and comfortable-enough suspension. However, the aging, simple interior, numb steer-by-wire system, clunky navigation, and noticeable cabin rumble hold it back against the newer BMW M340i. Despite finding the Q50 emotionally appealing and roughly $9,000 cheaper, both cars earn only a “lease it” verdict because neither fully delivers the luxury, technology, and refinement expected at this price.
Joe Raiti is genuinely impressed by the Q50 Red Sport 400, though he stops short of calling it the better sport sedan. He admires its timeless styling, 400-hp twin-turbo V6, comfortable seats, planted all-wheel-drive handling, strong brakes, and notably roomier rear seat than the BMW M340i. The $62,000 example also feels distinctive among German sedans. Still, its decade-old design shows through in the dated dual-screen infotainment, analog gauges, missing head-up display, artificial pumped-in engine sound, and unnatural steer-by-wire feedback. Raiti views it as quick, comfortable, and appealingly different, but clearly less connected and modern than the BMW.
ReDriven is enthusiastic about the Q50’s gorgeous design, potent twin-turbo V6, and remarkable used-market value. It portrays higher-performance versions as thrilling, characterful, and genuinely underappreciated, but warns that this is an enthusiast’s purchase rather than an easy luxury sedan. Common concerns include sunroof leaks, aging infotainment, vague early Direct Adaptive Steering, expensive or scarce parts, and serious risks with the Mercedes-sourced four-cylinder. The VR30 3.0-liter V6 is considered the standout choice when properly serviced. ReDriven’s verdict is strongly positive for well-inspected Red Sport 400 examples, provided owners maintain a substantial repair fund.
Gold Pony is highly enthusiastic about the 2024 Infiniti Q50 Red Sport 400, calling it exceptionally quick, sharp-braking, comfortable, and genuinely good-looking. He praises the 400-hp twin-turbo V6, responsive paddle shifters, adaptive suspension, rear-wheel-drive character, and surprisingly strong 16-speaker Bose audio system. His reservations are measured: steering could feel heavier, seat bolstering is modest, the interior and dual-screen technology feel dated, and the rear camera lacks clarity. Ultimately, he views the Q50 as an exciting, underrated sport sedan whose biggest missed opportunity is its bland Q50 name instead of the more evocative Skyline or Nismo branding.
Scotty Kilmer is strongly positive about the Infiniti Q50 as a used luxury sport sedan. He praises its smooth ride, quiet cabin, comfortable leather interior, strong V6, seamless transmission, and capable all-wheel-drive system. His scan-tool inspection of this 117,000-mile example found no major engine or transmission concerns, though minor speaker and parking-sensor faults were present. He criticizes low-profile tires, expensive electronic repairs, and sharply falling resale values, while warning buyers not to skip a pre-purchase inspection. Overall, he considers a well-maintained used Q50 a compelling bargain, not a wise new-car purchase.
Matt Smith is positive about the Infiniti Q50, especially its handsome, restrained styling, comfortable cabin, strong 300-hp twin-turbo V6, and value in base Luxe trim. He appreciates the smooth transmission, responsive dual-screen system, and usable space, even calling the infotainment less frustrating than expected. Still, the decade-old sedan feels behind newer rivals, with light steering, excess body roll, mediocre fuel economy, dated gauges and screens, and limited advanced safety technology. The $53,500 Sensory AWD tester is particularly hard to justify against similarly priced BMW and Audi sedans. Overall, it is attractive and powerful, but best bought in lower trim.
Chabby’s Rides is enthusiastic about the 2024 Infiniti Q50 Red Sport 400. He praises its responsive 400-hp twin-turbo V6, tight steering, strong brakes, grippy summer tires, and everyday versatility, calling it a genuinely fun alternative to the pricier BMW M340i. The Q50 also earns credit for flawless wireless Apple CarPlay, comfortable seats, and distinctive styling. Still, its aging design, dated infotainment, fuzzy backup camera, limited rear space, wide turning circle, and lack of a spare tire are meaningful compromises. Overall, he sees it as an excellent value for drivers prioritizing performance over modern technology.
Everyday Driver is impressed by the Q50 Red Sport 400’s power but ultimately disappointed by its numb steering. The twin-turbo V6, seven-speed automatic, adaptive suspension, styling, comfort, and sleeper appeal earn genuine praise, with 400 hp feeling unusually potent. Yet the electronic steering provides almost no feedback, undermining confidence and making the car feel disconnected through corners. They view it as a compelling highway commuter or used bargain—especially around half price—but not a convincing $60,000 sports sedan, since rivals such as the Genesis G70 offer more engaging handling.
ThatDudeinBlue is highly enthusiastic about the Infiniti Q50’s tuning potential and brutal torque. His modified example produces 525 wheel horsepower from the twin-turbo V6 with supporting bolt-ons, making it feel like a four-door preview of the Nissan 400Z. He enjoys the quiet ride, comfortable seats, improved cabin over the G37, and understated styling, while praising its tuner-friendly character over comparable German sedans. Still, he criticizes the automatic-only transmission, lack of paddles, small-looking rotors, limited trunk, and some cheap-feeling interior trim. Overall, his excitement centers on the Q50 as an exceptional performance platform rather than a polished luxury sedan.
Kevin is skeptical of the 2024 Infiniti Q50, viewing it as capable but far too old for its price. He credits the well-equipped Luxe trim, strong 300-hp twin-turbo V6, and especially the Red Sport 400’s 400 hp, upgraded brakes, and adaptive suspension. Still, the unchanged decade-old design, dated dual-screen interior, and high lease payments undermine its appeal. He sees low-interest leasing as the Q50’s main justification, though similarly priced Audi, Lexus, and BMW alternatives may offer more modern value.
Social
5 INFLUENCER REVIEWS
CJ is moderately positive about the Infiniti Q50, especially for budget-minded enthusiasts. He likes the fun-to-drive VR30 3.0T platform and its modding potential, but his recommendation comes with important caveats. The turbos failed at 100,000 miles, the factory pulley can misalign and require serpentine-belt replacement roughly every 25,000 miles, and the car is harder to work on than a Honda. He also finds the suspension underwhelming and suggests lowering springs and a sway-bar upgrade. Overall, he considers it reasonably reliable and worthwhile for enthusiasts who accept the maintenance.
BuiltByA1 is highly enthusiastic about the Infiniti Q50’s modified exhaust sound. After removing a damaged resonator and installing an X-pipe, he claims the sedan sounds better than a GT-R, with turbo spool more audible and volume roughly five times louder in person. His reaction is clearly subjective and focused on the appeal of a louder, sportier exhaust note rather than broader vehicle performance or ownership experience. No drawbacks, practical concerns, or balanced caveats are mentioned.
Ashraf is cautiously positive about the Infiniti Q50, calling it “high key fast” but warning that it can be unreliable. He compares its twin-turbo 3.0-liter V6, roughly five-second 0–60 time, and much lower used pricing with the Lexus IS 350. The Q50 appears to offer stronger value and similar performance, with rear- or all-wheel drive, though Ashraf’s reliability concern tempers the recommendation. Overall, the video is more of a researched comparison than a hands-on review, and he leaves the final choice open to viewers.
Caleb Butler is sharply negative about the 2024 INFINITI Q50, calling it an outdated entry-level luxury car. He criticizes its unchanged design, analog gauge cluster, roughly 9-inch screen, dated exterior, and modest engine output, arguing that a nearly $60,000 sedan should feel far newer. He concedes the interior appears solidly built and the seats may be comfortable, but treats those positives as minor. His central point is that INFINITI has neglected the Q50 while Nissan, Toyota, and Lexus receive more meaningful refreshes, making a BMW preferable at this price.
Terrell is highly enthusiastic about the INFINITI Q50 and strongly recommends it as an affordable starter car. He values its low purchase price, excellent aftermarket potential for modifications such as supercharging or turbocharging, perceived reliability, and low maintenance costs. He also considers the interior surprisingly good for an inexpensive first car, though he acknowledges that it feels somewhat outdated. Overall, his tone is energetic and confident, with the Q50’s affordability and tunability outweighing its older cabin design.
Forum Reviews
CUSTOMER REVIEWS FROM 1 FORUM
Redditors are broadly positive about the 2024 Infiniti Q50, especially its performance and value, but wary of its aging design. Owners praise the powerful, comfortable, fun-to-drive character, strong V6 engines, and attractive discounted pricing. Reliability experiences are generally encouraging, particularly with well-maintained 3.7-liter cars and later 3.0T models, though turbo concerns, expensive repairs, fuel costs, and insurance remain recurring reservations. The dated dual-screen infotainment, limited updates, mediocre steering feel, and poor resale value are its biggest weaknesses. As Infiniti’s final sedan year, the Q50 appeals to buyers who prioritize power and familiarity over modern technology or prestige.
Many comments
In-Depth Review
Highlights
- •Twin-Turbo V6 Power300 hp standard; Red Sport reaches 400.
- •Comfortable Front SeatsSupportive seating suits commuting and highways.
- •Distinctive Sedan StylingTimeless design helps it stand apart.
- •Rear-Wheel-Drive CharacterTraditional layout supports planted handling.
Considerations
- •Aging Infotainment SystemDual screens and navigation feel dated.
- •Unsettled Ride QualitySharp bumps can feel jarring.
- •Numb Steering FeedbackElectronic steering reduces cornering confidence.
- •Maintenance And Repair RisksTurbo and electronic repairs can be costly.
The Q50 remains Infiniti’s underappreciated answer to buyers who want traditional luxury-sedan character in an SUV-dominated market. Its main draw is a 300-hp twin-turbo V6, with the Red Sport 400 offering 400 hp—more muscle than most turbo-four rivals and plenty for commuting, highway passing, or spirited drives. A rear-wheel-drive layout preserves a classic sport-sedan feel, while comfortable front seats and available all-wheel drive broaden its everyday appeal. Still, this is an older design, so ride comfort, steering feedback, braking, cabin noise, and seating deserve closer scrutiny than the headline horsepower suggests. Enthusiasts, value-focused luxury shoppers, and drivers who prefer sedans over crossovers may find a compelling bargain, especially used, but should weigh maintenance costs and dated technology carefully. Explore these driving traits next—the Q50 has the muscles, but the finer manners tell the real story.

Braking Confidence
The Q50’s brakes are strong enough for brisk everyday driving, particularly on the Red Sport 400. That trim receives upgraded performance brakes, and reviewers generally praise its stopping power and responsive pedal. However, Edmunds found braking performance behind newer competitors, so the hardware does not completely overcome the sedan’s aging platform. This affects confidence during repeated hard stops or fast corner approaches more than routine commuting. Buyers should also inspect brake wear and replacement costs, especially on performance-trim or modified used examples.

Ride Quality
The Q50 is comfortable enough for commuting, but its suspension is not consistently luxurious. Front seats absorb long highway trips well, and the available adaptive suspension helps the Red Sport 400 balance comfort with control. Still, Edmunds describes the ride as jarring, while other reviewers note that sharper bumps can feel abrupt and unsettled. This matters because a luxury sedan should isolate occupants as well as it accelerates. The Q50 works best on smooth roads, where its quiet cruising and composed body are more convincing.
Front Seat Comfort
The Q50’s front seats are one of its more dependable strengths. Supportive cushioning and a generally comfortable driving position make the sedan well suited to commuting and longer highway trips, and reviewers regularly praise the seating. The cabin’s five-passenger layout gives it practical everyday flexibility, although rear space is merely adequate rather than generous. Red Sport versions can feel sportier without becoming punishing, but some reviewers find the bolstering modest. For buyers prioritizing relaxed daily usability over cutting-edge cabin design, the seats remain a persuasive feature.

Steering And Handling
The Q50 feels stable and capable, but the steering is its most divisive dynamic feature. Its Direct Adaptive Steering system uses electronic control rather than a conventional mechanical feel, which helps deliver a light, precise response but can seem artificial. Reviewers repeatedly describe the feedback as vague or numb, reducing confidence on winding roads. The standard rear-wheel-drive layout and available all-wheel drive still provide a planted stance, and Red Sport models add sport tuning. Enthusiasts may enjoy the chassis, but rivals generally feel more connected.

Cabin Noise Levels
The Q50’s cabin is not uniformly serene despite its comfortable seats and premium presentation. Its twin-turbo V6 supplies an appealing performance soundtrack, but reviewers also report intrusive road noise and a noticeable cabin rumble, particularly compared with newer luxury sedans. That distinction matters on long commutes, where tire and pavement noise can undermine the feeling of refinement. The 16-speaker Bose audio system helps occupy the cabin, yet it cannot fully compensate for limited insulation. Buyers should test the car on coarse pavement before deciding.
V6 Power Delivery
The Q50’s strongest argument is its effortless speed. Every 2024 model uses a 3.0-liter twin-turbo V6, producing 300 hp and 295 lb-ft, while the Red Sport 400 raises that to 400 hp and 350 lb-ft. The seven-speed automatic shifts smoothly, and published testing places 0–60 mph near five seconds for quicker versions. Owners and reviewers consistently praise acceleration and passing power, though fuel economy is only moderate. The engine supports the car’s value story, but maintenance history matters, especially around turbo-related concerns.
Conclusion
The Q50’s final verdict is a tale of V6 performance carrying an aging sedan a long way. Its 300-hp engine—and 400-hp Red Sport 400—delivers the acceleration owners and reviewers enjoy, while supportive front seats make commuting easy. Yet the ride quality can turn jarring, road noise intrudes, and numb steering weakens the connection enthusiasts expect from a sport sedan. Red Sport brakes improve confidence, though testing suggests they still trail newer rivals. That leaves a car best suited to drivers who value power, classic rear-wheel-drive character, and discounted pricing more than polished refinement or cutting-edge technology. Careful inspection and maintenance are essential, especially for used examples. The Q50 is a compelling performance bargain, but its compromises explain why it earns a cautiously favorable recommendation rather than an easy luxury-sedan endorsement.
Feature Scores
This reflects reviews and ratings from established critics, journalists, and users who have evaluated the item. Their opinions provide a comprehensive assessment.
Performance
Engine Power
4/5
Acceleration
4/5
Reliability & Durability
3/5
Handling & Ride Comfort
3/5
Braking Performance
3/5
Value
Purchase Price Competitiveness
4/5
Cost of Ownership
2/5
Resale Value
2/5
Feature Value
4/5
Design
Exterior Styling
4/5
Interior Ergonomics
3/5
Cargo Space
3/5
Infotainment Quality
2/5
Health
Cabin Air Quality
3/5
Material Toxicity
TBD
Safety
Crashworthiness
TBD
Active Safety Systems
2/5
Visibility & Lighting
3/5
Child Occupant Protection
TBD
Sustainability
Fuel Efficiency
2/5
Tailpipe Emissions
2/5
Recyclability
TBD
Manufacturing Footprint
TBD
Experience Style
Driver Engagement
3/5
Customization Options
4/5
Ease of Use
3/5
Ownership Convenience
2/5
Specifications
This section outlines the product's key facts, covering essential features, details, dimensions, materials, and any unique characteristics that define its functionality and usability.
Performance
Value
Design
Safety
Sustainability
Experience Style
Frequently Asked Questions
6 Questions
Find Yours
What is your primary use for a gas-powered sedan or compact?
Answer to find your best matches.







































